Japanese vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Japanese
Chickasaw
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Japanese
Chickasaw
13.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
14.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
215th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Japanese vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 231,157,970 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.565 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,053,704 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 16.3%, a difference of 24.6%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Japanese | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 4.0% |
| Maximum | 90.1% | 67.9% |
| Range | 88.4% | 63.9% |
| Mean | 21.4% | 25.6% |
| Median | 14.1% | 23.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.0% | 16.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.0% | 31.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.0% | 14.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.1% | 12.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.8% | 12.6% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Japanese by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Zimbabwean (13.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Austrian (13.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Italian (13.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Senegalese (13.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and Swedish (13.1%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 17.6 /100 | #208 | Poor 13.1% |
| Mexican American Indians | 17.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 16.8 /100 | #210 | Poor 13.1% |
| Swedes | 16.8 /100 | #211 | Poor 13.1% |
| Senegalese | 16.4 /100 | #212 | Poor 13.1% |
| Italians | 15.9 /100 | #213 | Poor 13.1% |
| Zimbabweans | 14.9 /100 | #214 | Poor 13.1% |
| Japanese | 14.8 /100 | #215 | Poor 13.1% |
| Austrians | 13.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 13.1% |
| Bermudans | 13.0 /100 | #217 | Poor 13.1% |
| Scandinavians | 12.9 /100 | #218 | Poor 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 12.6 /100 | #219 | Poor 13.1% |
| Central Americans | 10.9 /100 | #220 | Poor 13.2% |
| New Zealanders | 10.7 /100 | #221 | Poor 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 10.0 /100 | #222 | Poor 13.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Chippewa (16.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 0.78%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |