Palestinian vs Laotian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Palestinian
Laotian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Palestinians
Laotians
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
94.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
93.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Palestinian vs Laotian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,371,597 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.076 and weighted average of 12.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,727,554 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Laotians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.103 and weighted average of 12.6%, a difference of 0.42%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Palestinian | Laotian |
Minimum | 0.63% | 0.15% |
Maximum | 27.9% | 22.9% |
Range | 27.3% | 22.8% |
Mean | 12.0% | 10.9% |
Median | 11.8% | 11.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.0% | 8.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.6% | 13.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Palestinians and Laotians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Slavic (12.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from China (12.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Scottish (12.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Turkey (12.6%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Latvia (12.5%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Portuguese (12.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (12.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Paraguayan (12.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Turkey (12.6%, a difference of 0.19%), and Scottish (12.5%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Paraguayans | 93.0 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Soviet Union | 92.4 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | Israel | 92.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Canadians | 92.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Puget Sound Salish | 91.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 12.7% |