Palestinian vs English Female Poverty
COMPARE
Palestinian
English
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Palestinians
English
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
94.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
96.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Palestinian vs English Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,371,597 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.076 and weighted average of 12.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 578,145,061 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of English and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.457 and weighted average of 12.4%, a difference of 1.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Palestinian | English |
Minimum | 0.63% | 0.38% |
Maximum | 27.9% | 72.5% |
Range | 27.3% | 72.2% |
Mean | 12.0% | 17.3% |
Median | 11.8% | 12.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.0% | 9.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.6% | 19.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 9.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 13.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 13.3% |
Demographics Similar to Palestinians and English by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Slavic (12.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from China (12.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Scottish (12.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Turkey (12.6%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Latvia (12.5%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to English are Finnish (12.4%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Denmark (12.4%, a difference of 0.22%), Belgian (12.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Okinawan (12.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and Czechoslovakian (12.4%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Dutch | 96.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Okinawans | 96.4 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Finns | 96.4 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.4% |
English | 96.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |