Osage vs Immigrants from Thailand Poverty
COMPARE
Osage
Immigrants from Thailand
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Osage
Immigrants from Thailand
13.6%
POVERTY
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
229th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
POVERTY
3.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
218th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs Immigrants from Thailand Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,797,306 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.161 and weighted average of 13.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,935,515 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.414 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 1.7%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Osage | Immigrants from Thailand |
| Minimum | 2.8% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 28.9% | 71.4% |
| Range | 26.1% | 69.4% |
| Mean | 13.8% | 18.3% |
| Median | 13.1% | 16.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.9% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.7% | 23.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 11.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 11.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 11.0% |
Demographics Similar to Osage and Immigrants from Thailand by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Alaskan Athabascan (13.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Nigerian (13.6%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Nigeria (13.5%, a difference of 0.24%), Alaska Native (13.5%, a difference of 0.69%), and Marshallese (13.4%, a difference of 0.85%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Thailand are Immigrants from Uzbekistan (13.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Japanese (13.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Nonimmigrants (13.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Cambodia (13.4%, a difference of 0.12%), and American (13.4%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.1 /100 | #213 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Bermudans | 3.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Japanese | 3.3 /100 | #215 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 3.1 /100 | #218 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.0 /100 | #219 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Americans | 2.9 /100 | #220 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Alsatians | 2.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.6 /100 | #222 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 2.5 /100 | #223 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #224 | Tragic 13.4% |
| German Russians | 2.2 /100 | #225 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Marshallese | 2.2 /100 | #226 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Alaska Natives | 2.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.7 /100 | #228 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Osage | 1.5 /100 | #229 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 1.5 /100 | #230 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Nigerians | 1.4 /100 | #231 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Fijians | 0.8 /100 | #232 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 0.8 /100 | #233 | Tragic 13.8% |