Osage vs Immigrants from Thailand Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Osage
Immigrants from Thailand
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Osage
Immigrants from Thailand
32.1%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
37.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
188th/ 347
METRIC RANK
32.8%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
18.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
199th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs Immigrants from Thailand Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,866,368 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.131 and weighted average of 32.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 301,314,253 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.553 and weighted average of 32.8%, a difference of 2.2%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
Measurement | Osage | Immigrants from Thailand |
Minimum | 4.0% | 4.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 96.0% | 95.7% |
Mean | 41.9% | 45.5% |
Median | 33.0% | 37.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 25.9% | 32.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 48.4% | 49.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.5% | 17.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 26.2% | 26.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 25.8% | 25.7% |
Demographics Similar to Osage and Immigrants from Thailand by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Immigrants from Kenya (32.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Czechoslovakian (32.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Welsh (32.0%, a difference of 0.11%), German (32.0%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from South America (32.0%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Thailand are Immigrants from Germany (32.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Costa Rican (32.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants (32.7%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (32.9%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Micronesia (32.9%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Canadians | 41.4 /100 | #183 | Average 31.9% |
Immigrants | South America | 40.7 /100 | #184 | Average 32.0% |
Germans | 39.5 /100 | #185 | Fair 32.0% |
Welsh | 38.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 32.0% |
Czechoslovakians | 38.0 /100 | #187 | Fair 32.0% |
Osage | 37.1 /100 | #188 | Fair 32.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 36.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 32.1% |
Tlingit-Haida | 32.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 32.2% |
Irish | 32.4 /100 | #191 | Fair 32.2% |
Colombians | 31.9 /100 | #192 | Fair 32.2% |
Fijians | 31.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 32.3% |
Sudanese | 27.3 /100 | #194 | Fair 32.4% |
Samoans | 21.9 /100 | #195 | Fair 32.6% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 21.7 /100 | #196 | Fair 32.6% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 20.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 32.7% |
Costa Ricans | 20.3 /100 | #198 | Fair 32.7% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 18.9 /100 | #199 | Poor 32.8% |
Immigrants | Germany | 18.8 /100 | #200 | Poor 32.8% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 16.7 /100 | #201 | Poor 32.9% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 16.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 32.9% |
Ute | 14.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 33.0% |