Irish vs Bhutanese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Irish
Bhutanese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Irish
Bhutanese
21.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
21.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
200th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Irish vs Bhutanese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 557,675,928 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Irish and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.662 and weighted average of 21.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,564,428 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.334 and weighted average of 17.7%, a difference of 21.1%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Irish | Bhutanese |
Minimum | 7.7% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 41.4% |
Range | 92.3% | 40.1% |
Mean | 34.3% | 15.9% |
Median | 21.2% | 15.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.4% | 10.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 34.5% | 19.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.1% | 9.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 28.5% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 28.4% | 7.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Irish by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Irish are Nigerian (21.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants (21.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Kenya (21.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Swiss (21.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Haiti (21.5%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Basques | 28.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 21.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 27.7 /100 | #194 | Fair 21.3% |
Nicaraguans | 27.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 21.3% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 27.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 21.3% |
Japanese | 26.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 21.3% |
Swiss | 24.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 21.4% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 22.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 21.4% |
Irish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 21.4% |
Nigerians | 20.9 /100 | #201 | Fair 21.4% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 20.7 /100 | #202 | Fair 21.4% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 18.8 /100 | #203 | Poor 21.5% |
Immigrants | Africa | 16.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 21.5% |
Finns | 16.2 /100 | #205 | Poor 21.5% |
Belgians | 16.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 21.5% |
Ghanaians | 15.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 21.6% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Ireland (17.8%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Lithuania (17.8%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (17.8%, a difference of 0.56%), Immigrants from Bolivia (17.8%, a difference of 0.82%), and Bolivian (17.9%, a difference of 1.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |