Immigrants from Bolivia vs Bhutanese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bolivia
Bhutanese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Bolivia
Bhutanese
17.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bolivia vs Bhutanese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 157,883,444 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bolivia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.368 and weighted average of 17.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,564,428 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.334 and weighted average of 17.7%, a difference of 0.82%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Bolivia | Bhutanese |
Minimum | 3.6% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 82.5% | 41.4% |
Range | 78.9% | 40.1% |
Mean | 19.6% | 15.9% |
Median | 17.3% | 15.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.3% | 10.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.9% | 19.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 9.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.6% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.5% | 7.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bolivia and Bhutanese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bolivia are Immigrants from South Central Asia (17.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Lithuania (17.8%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Ireland (17.8%, a difference of 0.41%), Bolivian (17.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and Indian (Asian) (17.9%, a difference of 0.59%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Ireland (17.8%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Lithuania (17.8%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (17.8%, a difference of 0.56%), Bolivian (17.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Iran (17.5%, a difference of 1.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 16.1% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 18.3% |