Immigrants from Yemen vs Ute Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Yemen
Ute
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Yemen
Ute
16.9%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
324th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.7%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
307th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Yemen vs Ute Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,158,341 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Yemen and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.200 and weighted average of 16.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,243,903 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.584 and weighted average of 15.7%, a difference of 7.5%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Yemen | Ute |
Minimum | 4.7% | 11.8% |
Maximum | 32.4% | 100.0% |
Range | 27.7% | 88.2% |
Mean | 18.0% | 45.2% |
Median | 18.3% | 37.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.3% | 19.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.7% | 62.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.4% | 42.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 31.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 30.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Yemen and Ute by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Yemen are Creek (16.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Choctaw (17.0%, a difference of 0.72%), Shoshone (16.7%, a difference of 1.1%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 2.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Potawatomi (15.8%, a difference of 0.57%), American (15.8%, a difference of 0.73%), Pennsylvania German (15.6%, a difference of 0.75%), Blackfeet (15.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and Yakama (15.9%, a difference of 1.6%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 15.5% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 15.6% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 15.7% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 15.8% |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 15.8% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 15.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |