Immigrants from Yemen vs Alaskan Athabascan Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Yemen
Alaskan Athabascan
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Yemen
Alaskan Athabascans
16.9%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
324th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Yemen vs Alaskan Athabascan Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,158,341 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Yemen and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.200 and weighted average of 16.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,419,805 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.708 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 4.7%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Yemen | Alaskan Athabascan |
Minimum | 4.7% | 4.3% |
Maximum | 32.4% | 100.0% |
Range | 27.7% | 95.7% |
Mean | 18.0% | 32.4% |
Median | 18.3% | 28.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.3% | 14.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.7% | 42.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.4% | 28.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 23.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 22.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Yemen and Alaskan Athabascans by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Yemen are Creek (16.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Choctaw (17.0%, a difference of 0.72%), Shoshone (16.7%, a difference of 1.1%), Central American Indian (17.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and Osage (16.5%, a difference of 2.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Cheyenne (16.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Cherokee (16.1%, a difference of 0.29%), Seminole (16.0%, a difference of 0.52%), and Comanche (16.0%, a difference of 0.52%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 15.8% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 15.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 17.2% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 17.7% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.3% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.4% |