Immigrants from Pakistan vs Bhutanese Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Pakistan
Bhutanese
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Pakistan
Bhutanese
11.2%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Pakistan vs Bhutanese Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,771,473 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Pakistan and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.268 and weighted average of 11.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 397,447,211 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.032 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 1.3%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Pakistan | Bhutanese |
Minimum | 1.8% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 42.3% | 57.1% |
Range | 40.5% | 55.5% |
Mean | 12.1% | 13.5% |
Median | 10.9% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 7.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.8% | 15.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 8.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.7% | 10.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.6% | 10.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Pakistan and Bhutanese by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Pakistan are Asian (11.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Bolivian (11.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Indian (Asian) (11.3%, a difference of 0.41%), Maltese (11.3%, a difference of 0.43%), and Ethiopian (11.2%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Tsimshian (11.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Bolivia (11.1%, a difference of 0.42%), Korean (11.0%, a difference of 0.75%), Chinese (11.0%, a difference of 0.81%), and Immigrants from Moldova (11.2%, a difference of 0.81%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Taiwanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.4% |