Immigrants from Asia vs Bhutanese Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Asia
Bhutanese
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Asia
Bhutanese
11.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
28th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Asia vs Bhutanese Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 461,688,534 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.062 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 397,447,211 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.032 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 2.8%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Asia | Bhutanese |
Minimum | 4.9% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 25.0% | 57.1% |
Range | 20.1% | 55.5% |
Mean | 10.9% | 13.5% |
Median | 10.6% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.4% | 7.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.8% | 15.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 8.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 10.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 10.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Asia and Bhutanese by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Asia are Immigrants from China (11.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Egypt (11.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Iranian (11.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Iran (11.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (11.4%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Tsimshian (11.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Bolivia (11.1%, a difference of 0.42%), Korean (11.0%, a difference of 0.75%), Chinese (11.0%, a difference of 0.81%), and Immigrants from Moldova (11.2%, a difference of 0.81%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.4% |