Immigrants from Jamaica vs Celtic Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Jamaica
Celtic
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Jamaica
Celtics
21.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
30.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
192nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Jamaica vs Celtic Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 298,568,365 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jamaica and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.077 and weighted average of 21.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,592,415 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.360 and weighted average of 22.7%, a difference of 6.8%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Jamaica | Celtic |
Minimum | 4.4% | 11.1% |
Maximum | 59.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 54.9% | 88.9% |
Mean | 20.4% | 33.1% |
Median | 20.8% | 27.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.6% | 22.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.1% | 39.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 17.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.3% | 16.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.2% | 16.7% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jamaica by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jamaica are Immigrants from Germany (21.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Basque (21.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Czechoslovakian (21.3%, a difference of 0.21%), Nicaraguan (21.3%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (21.3%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 38.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 21.2% |
Hawaiians | 37.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 36.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 21.2% |
Yugoslavians | 35.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 35.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 21.2% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 35.2 /100 | #190 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Germany | 31.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 21.3% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 30.5 /100 | #192 | Fair 21.3% |
Basques | 28.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 21.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 27.7 /100 | #194 | Fair 21.3% |
Nicaraguans | 27.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 21.3% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 27.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 21.3% |
Japanese | 26.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 21.3% |
Swiss | 24.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 21.4% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 22.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 21.4% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are White/Caucasian (22.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Bahamian (22.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (22.8%, a difference of 0.27%), Sudanese (22.6%, a difference of 0.41%), and British West Indian (22.8%, a difference of 0.52%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.9 /100 | #253 | Tragic 22.5% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 22.6% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.8 /100 | #255 | Tragic 22.6% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.8 /100 | #256 | Tragic 22.6% |
Sudanese | 0.7 /100 | #257 | Tragic 22.6% |
Bahamians | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 22.7% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 22.7% |
Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |
British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |