Immigrants from Jamaica vs Basque Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Jamaica
Basque
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Jamaica
Basques
21.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
30.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
192nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
28.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
193rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Jamaica vs Basque Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 298,568,365 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jamaica and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.077 and weighted average of 21.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,728,632 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Basques and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.494 and weighted average of 21.3%, a difference of 0.18%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Jamaica | Basque |
Minimum | 4.4% | 6.1% |
Maximum | 59.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 54.9% | 93.9% |
Mean | 20.4% | 29.2% |
Median | 20.8% | 22.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.6% | 19.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.1% | 33.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 14.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.3% | 17.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.2% | 17.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jamaica and Basques by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jamaica are Immigrants from Germany (21.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Czechoslovakian (21.3%, a difference of 0.21%), Nicaraguan (21.3%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (21.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and Japanese (21.3%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Basques are Czechoslovakian (21.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Nicaraguan (21.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (21.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Japanese (21.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Germany (21.3%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |
Slovaks | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 21.1% |
Hungarians | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 21.1% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 38.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 21.2% |
Hawaiians | 37.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 36.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 21.2% |
Yugoslavians | 35.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 35.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 21.2% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 35.2 /100 | #190 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Germany | 31.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 21.3% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 30.5 /100 | #192 | Fair 21.3% |
Basques | 28.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 21.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 27.7 /100 | #194 | Fair 21.3% |
Nicaraguans | 27.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 21.3% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 27.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 21.3% |
Japanese | 26.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 21.3% |
Swiss | 24.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 21.4% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 22.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 21.4% |
Irish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 21.4% |
Nigerians | 20.9 /100 | #201 | Fair 21.4% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 20.7 /100 | #202 | Fair 21.4% |