Immigrants from Dominica vs Chippewa Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Dominica
Chippewa
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Dominica
Chippewa
17.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
302nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Dominica vs Chippewa Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,788,429 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Dominica and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.150 and weighted average of 17.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,995,312 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.544 and weighted average of 16.7%, a difference of 4.6%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Dominica | Chippewa |
Minimum | 2.4% | 7.0% |
Maximum | 54.5% | 78.4% |
Range | 52.1% | 71.4% |
Mean | 18.0% | 25.6% |
Median | 16.9% | 20.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.1% | 15.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.1% | 31.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.0% | 15.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.3% | 15.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.2% | 15.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Dominica and Chippewa by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Dominica are Arapaho (17.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Cajun (17.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Ute (17.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Congo (17.4%, a difference of 0.42%), and Honduran (17.4%, a difference of 0.61%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Guatemalan (16.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Choctaw (16.8%, a difference of 0.61%), Immigrants from Central America (16.8%, a difference of 0.67%), Immigrants from Grenada (16.8%, a difference of 0.67%), and Immigrants from Caribbean (16.9%, a difference of 0.94%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 16.7% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% |