Austrian vs Chippewa Female Poverty
COMPARE
Austrian
Chippewa
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Austrians
Chippewa
12.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
66th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
302nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Austrian vs Chippewa Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 451,657,404 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Austrians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.763 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,995,312 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.544 and weighted average of 16.7%, a difference of 37.0%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Austrian | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 3.3% | 7.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 78.4% |
| Range | 96.7% | 71.4% |
| Mean | 28.2% | 25.6% |
| Median | 16.5% | 20.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.6% | 15.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.2% | 31.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.6% | 15.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 28.8% | 15.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 28.5% | 15.0% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Austrians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Austrians are Indian (Asian) (12.2%, a difference of 0.010%), German (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Ukrainian (12.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (12.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Italy (12.2%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Europe | 98.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 98.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 98.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 98.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Ukrainians | 98.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Germans | 98.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Indians (Asian) | 97.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Austrians | 97.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 97.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.8 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Swiss | 97.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 97.7 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 97.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Cambodians | 97.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Guatemalan (16.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Bahamian (16.6%, a difference of 0.36%), Hispanic or Latino (16.6%, a difference of 0.40%), Choctaw (16.8%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Central America (16.8%, a difference of 0.67%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |