German vs Czech Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
German
Czech
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Germans
Czechs
4.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
German vs Czech Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 564,067,138 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Germans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284 and weighted average of 4.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 476,498,804 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.106 and weighted average of 4.0%, a difference of 0.34%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | German | Czech |
Minimum | 1.4% | 0.69% |
Maximum | 50.4% | 27.6% |
Range | 49.1% | 26.9% |
Mean | 5.4% | 5.4% |
Median | 3.6% | 3.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.0% | 3.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.0% | 6.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 4.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 4.5% |
Demographics Similar to Germans and Czechs by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Germans are Filipino (4.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Italian (4.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Polish (4.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Slovak (4.0%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Ireland (4.1%, a difference of 0.82%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Slovak (4.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Polish (4.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Filipino (4.0%, a difference of 0.37%), Italian (4.0%, a difference of 0.38%), and Bulgarian (4.0%, a difference of 0.88%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Germans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Italians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Zimbabweans | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.1% |