German vs Carpatho Rusyn Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
German
Carpatho Rusyn
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Germans
Carpatho Rusyns
4.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
10th/ 347
METRIC RANK
German vs Carpatho Rusyn Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 564,067,138 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Germans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284 and weighted average of 4.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,607,667 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.274 and weighted average of 3.9%, a difference of 2.5%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | German | Carpatho Rusyn |
Minimum | 1.4% | 0.39% |
Maximum | 50.4% | 8.8% |
Range | 49.1% | 8.4% |
Mean | 5.4% | 3.7% |
Median | 3.6% | 3.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.0% | 1.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.0% | 5.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 2.2% |
Demographics Similar to Germans and Carpatho Rusyns by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Germans are Filipino (4.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Italian (4.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Polish (4.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Slovak (4.0%, a difference of 0.30%), and Czech (4.0%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Carpatho Rusyns are Croatian (3.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Thai (3.9%, a difference of 0.49%), Lithuanian (4.0%, a difference of 0.51%), Latvian (3.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and Bulgarian (4.0%, a difference of 1.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Germans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Italians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Zimbabweans | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 4.1% |