Finnish vs Chinese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Finnish
Chinese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Finns
Chinese
21.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
16.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
205th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Finnish vs Chinese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 396,433,043 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Finns and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.530 and weighted average of 21.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,651,041 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.244 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 33.5%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Finnish | Chinese |
Minimum | 9.5% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 43.0% |
Range | 90.5% | 41.7% |
Mean | 33.0% | 16.1% |
Median | 28.4% | 16.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.2% | 9.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 40.2% | 20.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.0% | 10.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.5% | 9.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.4% | 9.1% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Finns by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Finns are Belgian (21.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Ghanaian (21.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Africa (21.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Haitian (21.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Eastern Africa (21.6%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Swiss | 24.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 21.4% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 22.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 21.4% |
Irish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 21.4% |
Nigerians | 20.9 /100 | #201 | Fair 21.4% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 20.7 /100 | #202 | Fair 21.4% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 18.8 /100 | #203 | Poor 21.5% |
Immigrants | Africa | 16.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 21.5% |
Finns | 16.2 /100 | #205 | Poor 21.5% |
Belgians | 16.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 21.5% |
Ghanaians | 15.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 21.6% |
Haitians | 15.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 21.6% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 15.1 /100 | #209 | Poor 21.6% |
Immigrants | Panama | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 21.6% |
Icelanders | 14.0 /100 | #211 | Poor 21.6% |
Jamaicans | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 21.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (16.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.5%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from India (16.8%, a difference of 4.2%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (17.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 5.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 16.1% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |