Finnish vs Chinese Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Finnish
Chinese
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Finns
Chinese
3.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
291st/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
289th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Finnish vs Chinese Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,503,893 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Finns and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.192 and weighted average of 3.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,631 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.314 and weighted average of 3.7%, a difference of 0.15%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Finnish | Chinese |
Minimum | 1.3% | 0.63% |
Maximum | 10.9% | 11.0% |
Range | 9.7% | 10.4% |
Mean | 4.9% | 4.4% |
Median | 4.6% | 3.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.8% | 3.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.0% | 4.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 1.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.8% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.8% | 2.2% |
Demographics Similar to Finns and Chinese by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Finns are White/Caucasian (3.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Native Hawaiian (3.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Norwegian (3.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Irish (3.7%, a difference of 0.35%), and Iroquois (3.7%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are White/Caucasian (3.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Irish (3.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Native Hawaiian (3.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Norwegian (3.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and Iroquois (3.7%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 3.6% |
Scandinavians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 3.6% |
Swedes | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 3.6% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 3.6% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 3.6% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 3.6% |
Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 3.6% |
Spanish | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 3.7% |
Irish | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 3.7% |
Chinese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 3.7% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 3.7% |
Finns | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 3.7% |
Native Hawaiians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 3.7% |
Norwegians | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 3.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 3.7% |
Welsh | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 3.7% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 3.7% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 3.7% |
Celtics | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 3.7% |
Germans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 3.7% |
Scottish | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 3.7% |