Egyptian vs Zimbabwean Male Poverty
COMPARE
Egyptian
Zimbabwean
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Egyptians
Zimbabweans
10.3%
MALE POVERTY
95.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
82nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.2%
MALE POVERTY
97.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Egyptian vs Zimbabwean Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 276,705,416 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Egyptians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.221 and weighted average of 10.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,180,294 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.027 and weighted average of 10.2%, a difference of 1.4%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Egyptian | Zimbabwean |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 34.6% | 18.8% |
| Range | 33.4% | 17.7% |
| Mean | 9.6% | 8.1% |
| Median | 8.4% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.3% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to Egyptians and Zimbabweans by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Egyptians are Belgian (10.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Sweden (10.3%, a difference of 0.12%), English (10.3%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from North America (10.3%, a difference of 0.48%), and Irish (10.3%, a difference of 0.72%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Serbian (10.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Swiss (10.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Netherlands (10.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (10.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and Slovak (10.2%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Slovaks | 97.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Swiss | 97.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Serbians | 97.5 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.3 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 97.1 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Paraguayans | 97.1 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Europeans | 97.1 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 97.1 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 97.0 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 96.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 96.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Dutch | 96.9 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 96.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Irish | 96.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 96.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| English | 96.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Belgians | 95.9 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Egyptians | 95.9 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 95.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 10.3% |