Asian vs Zimbabwean Male Poverty
COMPARE
Asian
Zimbabwean
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Asians
Zimbabweans
10.0%
MALE POVERTY
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
52nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.2%
MALE POVERTY
97.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Asian vs Zimbabwean Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 549,643,011 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Asians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.208 and weighted average of 10.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,180,294 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.027 and weighted average of 10.2%, a difference of 1.8%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Asian | Zimbabwean |
Minimum | 1.7% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 31.2% | 18.8% |
Range | 29.4% | 17.7% |
Mean | 8.8% | 8.1% |
Median | 8.8% | 8.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.6% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.1% | 11.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.3% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to Asians and Zimbabweans by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Asians are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (10.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Croatia (10.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Philippines (10.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Slovene (10.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Japan (10.0%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Serbian (10.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Swiss (10.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Netherlands (10.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (10.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and Slovak (10.2%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Japan | 98.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Slovenes | 98.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Asians | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.6 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.5 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Germans | 98.3 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.2 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Estonians | 98.1 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Scandinavians | 98.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 97.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Ukrainians | 97.9 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Austrians | 97.8 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.8 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Slovaks | 97.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Swiss | 97.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Serbians | 97.5 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.3 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 10.2% |