Ecuadorian vs French American Indian Poverty
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
French American Indian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Ecuadorians
French American Indians
14.0%
POVERTY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
242nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.9%
POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
237th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ecuadorian vs French American Indian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,659,954 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 14.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,970,723 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of French American Indians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.446 and weighted average of 13.9%, a difference of 0.94%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ecuadorian | French American Indian |
Minimum | 0.41% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 28.2% | 29.6% |
Range | 27.8% | 27.4% |
Mean | 13.5% | 14.8% |
Median | 13.2% | 14.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.7% | 11.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.0% | 16.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 5.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians and French American Indians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Sudanese (14.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Nepalese (14.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Salvadoran (14.0%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (14.0%, a difference of 0.34%), and Nicaraguan (13.9%, a difference of 0.46%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to French American Indians are Immigrants from Armenia (13.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Cuban (13.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Ghanaian (13.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Nicaraguan (13.9%, a difference of 0.48%), and Immigrants from Laos (13.8%, a difference of 0.49%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Osage | 1.5 /100 | #229 | Tragic 13.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 1.5 /100 | #230 | Tragic 13.6% |
Nigerians | 1.4 /100 | #231 | Tragic 13.6% |
Fijians | 0.8 /100 | #232 | Tragic 13.7% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 0.8 /100 | #233 | Tragic 13.8% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.7 /100 | #234 | Tragic 13.8% |
Cubans | 0.6 /100 | #235 | Tragic 13.9% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.5 /100 | #236 | Tragic 13.9% |
French American Indians | 0.5 /100 | #237 | Tragic 13.9% |
Ghanaians | 0.5 /100 | #238 | Tragic 13.9% |
Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 13.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 14.0% |
Salvadorans | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 14.0% |
Ecuadorians | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 14.0% |
Sudanese | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 14.0% |
Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 14.0% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 14.1% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 14.1% |
Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 14.1% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 14.1% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 14.2% |