Ecuadorian vs Cherokee Poverty
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Cherokee
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Ecuadorians
Cherokee
14.0%
POVERTY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
242nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.4%
POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
261st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ecuadorian vs Cherokee Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,659,954 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 14.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,337,715 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.341 and weighted average of 14.4%, a difference of 2.5%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ecuadorian | Cherokee |
Minimum | 0.41% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 28.2% | 54.1% |
Range | 27.8% | 52.4% |
Mean | 13.5% | 19.3% |
Median | 13.2% | 17.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.7% | 14.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.0% | 22.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 7.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 8.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 8.8% |
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians and Cherokee by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Sudanese (14.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Nepalese (14.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Salvadoran (14.0%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Sudan (14.1%, a difference of 0.49%), and Potawatomi (14.1%, a difference of 0.68%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Cape Verdean (14.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (14.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Ottawa (14.3%, a difference of 0.37%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (14.3%, a difference of 0.38%), and Mexican American Indian (14.3%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Salvadorans | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 14.0% |
Ecuadorians | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 14.0% |
Sudanese | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 14.0% |
Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 14.0% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 14.1% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 14.1% |
Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 14.1% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 14.1% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 14.2% |
Cree | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 14.2% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 14.2% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 14.2% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 14.2% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 14.3% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 14.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 14.3% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 14.3% |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 14.3% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 14.3% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 14.4% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 14.4% |