Czechoslovakian vs Swiss Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Swiss
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Swiss
9.5%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.2%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian vs Swiss Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,521,017 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.078 and weighted average of 9.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 462,823,104 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.516 and weighted average of 9.2%, a difference of 2.7%.
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czechoslovakian | Swiss |
Minimum | 1.1% | 3.4% |
Maximum | 44.2% | 68.4% |
Range | 43.1% | 65.1% |
Mean | 11.8% | 12.6% |
Median | 9.7% | 8.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.6% | 7.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.2% | 12.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.2% | 12.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.1% | 11.9% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians and Swiss by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Latvian (9.5%, a difference of 0.050%), British (9.4%, a difference of 0.43%), Scotch-Irish (9.5%, a difference of 0.50%), Native Hawaiian (9.4%, a difference of 0.53%), and Northern European (9.4%, a difference of 0.55%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Thai (9.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Slovak (9.2%, a difference of 0.29%), Scottish (9.2%, a difference of 0.32%), Luxembourger (9.2%, a difference of 0.43%), and Slovene (9.3%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
Scottish | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Slovaks | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Thais | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Slovenes | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Welsh | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Irish | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Italians | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Menominee | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Finns | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Native Hawaiians | 99.8 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.4% |
British | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Czechoslovakians | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 99.7 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.5% |