Czechoslovakian vs Swiss Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Swiss
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Swiss
4.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
58th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian vs Swiss Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 364,959,932 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.270 and weighted average of 4.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 457,863,093 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.685 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 1.5%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czechoslovakian | Swiss |
Minimum | 1.3% | 0.49% |
Maximum | 21.7% | 52.4% |
Range | 20.4% | 51.9% |
Mean | 6.9% | 8.1% |
Median | 4.9% | 4.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 3.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.7% | 7.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 9.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 9.7% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians and Swiss by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (4.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Netherlands (4.3%, a difference of 0.090%), French (4.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Austrian (4.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and Welsh (4.3%, a difference of 0.53%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Immigrants from Japan (4.3%, a difference of 0.38%), Serbian (4.3%, a difference of 0.39%), British (4.3%, a difference of 0.42%), Scottish (4.3%, a difference of 0.44%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.3%, a difference of 0.54%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
French Canadians | 99.8 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Swiss | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Tlingit-Haida | 99.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 4.4% |