Chinese vs Slavic Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Chinese
Slavic
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Chinese
Slavs
11.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
84.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Slavic Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,708,230 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.283 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,135,451 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.598 and weighted average of 15.7%, a difference of 32.0%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | Slavic |
Minimum | 0.70% | 3.7% |
Maximum | 58.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 57.6% | 96.3% |
Mean | 14.1% | 28.3% |
Median | 10.7% | 17.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 13.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.9% | 34.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.7% | 21.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.9% | 26.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.8% | 26.0% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (11.7%, a difference of 1.6%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.3%, a difference of 3.3%), Iranian (12.4%, a difference of 4.9%), Immigrants from Singapore (12.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and Immigrants from Iran (12.5%, a difference of 5.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Immigrants from Hungary (15.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Fiji (15.7%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Peru (15.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Kuwait (15.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and Samoan (15.7%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Peruvians | 88.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 15.5% |
Portuguese | 87.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.5% |
Icelanders | 87.5 /100 | #136 | Excellent 15.5% |
Immigrants | Spain | 87.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 86.5 /100 | #138 | Excellent 15.6% |
Albanians | 86.5 /100 | #139 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 85.6 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.6% |
Slavs | 84.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 84.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.7% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 83.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.7% |
Immigrants | Peru | 83.5 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.7% |
Samoans | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.7% |
New Zealanders | 82.4 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.7% |
Venezuelans | 82.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.7% |
Brazilians | 81.0 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.8% |