Chinese vs Slavic Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Chinese
Slavic
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Chinese
Slavs
26.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
324th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
1.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
257th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Slavic Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,800,060 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.382 and weighted average of 26.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,744,912 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Slavs and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.081 and weighted average of 26.8%, a difference of 3.0%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | Slavic |
Minimum | 5.1% | 4.7% |
Maximum | 42.8% | 47.1% |
Range | 37.7% | 42.3% |
Mean | 24.4% | 22.2% |
Median | 24.0% | 23.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.6% | 15.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.8% | 27.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.2% | 11.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 8.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.7% | 8.3% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households with Children
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Australia (26.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Barbadian (26.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Greece (26.0%, a difference of 0.070%), British West Indian (26.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Ireland (26.0%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.1% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.1% |
Immigrants | France | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.0% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.0% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.0% |
Immigrants | Greece | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.0% |
Immigrants | Australia | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chinese | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.0% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 26.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 26.0% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 26.0% |
Immigrants | Albania | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 25.9% |
Cypriots | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 25.9% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 25.9% |
Slovenes | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 25.8% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Immigrants from Cuba (26.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Lithuania (26.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Scotch-Irish (26.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Jamaica (26.8%, a difference of 0.050%), and German Russian (26.8%, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Belgians | 2.1 /100 | #250 | Tragic 26.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1.9 /100 | #251 | Tragic 26.8% |
Irish | 1.8 /100 | #252 | Tragic 26.8% |
Italians | 1.5 /100 | #253 | Tragic 26.8% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 1.5 /100 | #254 | Tragic 26.8% |
German Russians | 1.5 /100 | #255 | Tragic 26.8% |
Scotch-Irish | 1.4 /100 | #256 | Tragic 26.8% |
Slavs | 1.3 /100 | #257 | Tragic 26.8% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 1.3 /100 | #258 | Tragic 26.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 1.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 26.8% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 1.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 26.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 1.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 26.8% |
Immigrants | Russia | 1.0 /100 | #262 | Tragic 26.8% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 1.0 /100 | #263 | Tragic 26.7% |
Taiwanese | 0.9 /100 | #264 | Tragic 26.7% |