Central American Indian vs Chippewa Male Poverty
COMPARE
Central American Indian
Chippewa
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Central American Indians
Chippewa
15.3%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
326th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.6%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American Indian vs Chippewa Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 326,052,023 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.618 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,985,801 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.628 and weighted average of 14.6%, a difference of 5.0%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Central American Indian | Chippewa |
Minimum | 1.9% | 5.1% |
Maximum | 94.9% | 62.5% |
Range | 93.0% | 57.4% |
Mean | 23.8% | 22.5% |
Median | 17.9% | 18.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.5% | 13.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.5% | 29.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.1% | 16.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.9% | 12.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.8% | 11.9% |
Demographics Similar to Central American Indians and Chippewa by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Yakama (15.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Menominee (15.3%, a difference of 0.29%), Colville (15.2%, a difference of 0.48%), Kiowa (15.2%, a difference of 0.87%), and Arapaho (15.1%, a difference of 1.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are British West Indian (14.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Honduras (14.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Somalia (14.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Dominica (14.7%, a difference of 0.70%), and Immigrants from Grenada (14.7%, a difference of 0.76%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 14.3% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 14.3% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 14.6% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 14.6% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 14.7% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 14.7% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 14.7% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 14.7% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 15.1% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 15.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 15.2% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 15.3% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 15.3% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 15.3% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 15.8% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 15.8% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 16.2% |