Central American Indian vs Bhutanese Male Poverty
COMPARE
Central American Indian
Bhutanese
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Central American Indians
Bhutanese
15.3%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
326th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
MALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American Indian vs Bhutanese Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 326,052,023 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.618 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,976,396 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.078 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 61.9%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Central American Indian | Bhutanese |
Minimum | 1.9% | 2.8% |
Maximum | 94.9% | 31.2% |
Range | 93.0% | 28.3% |
Mean | 23.8% | 8.9% |
Median | 17.9% | 8.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.5% | 5.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.5% | 11.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.1% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.9% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.8% | 4.8% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Central American Indians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Yakama (15.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Menominee (15.3%, a difference of 0.29%), Colville (15.2%, a difference of 0.48%), Kiowa (15.2%, a difference of 0.87%), and Arapaho (15.1%, a difference of 1.6%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 14.7% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 14.7% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 15.1% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 15.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 15.2% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 15.3% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 15.3% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 15.3% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 15.8% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 15.8% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 16.2% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 16.2% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 16.7% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 16.9% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from North Macedonia (9.4%, a difference of 0.29%), Luxembourger (9.5%, a difference of 0.52%), Norwegian (9.5%, a difference of 0.65%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.4%, a difference of 0.67%), and Immigrants from Bolivia (9.4%, a difference of 0.79%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |