Celtic vs Hungarian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Celtic
Hungarian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Celtics
Hungarians
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
49.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
175th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
70.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
155th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Hungarian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,846,795 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.728 and weighted average of 13.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 485,692,155 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.438 and weighted average of 13.2%, a difference of 2.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Celtic | Hungarian |
Minimum | 2.2% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 73.9% |
Range | 97.8% | 72.6% |
Mean | 15.9% | 18.8% |
Median | 12.9% | 12.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.3% | 8.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.6% | 26.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.3% | 17.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.5% | 16.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.5% | 16.5% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics and Hungarians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Iraq (13.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (13.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Mongolian (13.4%, a difference of 0.36%), White/Caucasian (13.4%, a difference of 0.46%), and Colombian (13.4%, a difference of 0.57%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hungarians are Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (13.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (13.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Pennsylvania German (13.2%, a difference of 0.32%), Costa Rican (13.3%, a difference of 0.73%), and Immigrants from Nepal (13.3%, a difference of 0.82%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |