Celtic vs Costa Rican Female Poverty
COMPARE
Celtic
Costa Rican
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Celtics
Costa Ricans
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
49.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
175th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
63.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Costa Rican Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,846,795 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.728 and weighted average of 13.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,437,784 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.003 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 1.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Celtic | Costa Rican |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 3.4% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 45.8% |
| Range | 97.8% | 42.4% |
| Mean | 15.9% | 11.8% |
| Median | 12.9% | 11.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.3% | 6.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.6% | 13.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.3% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.5% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.5% | 6.9% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics and Costa Ricans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Spain (13.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Iraq (13.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Morocco (13.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (13.4%, a difference of 0.080%), and Mongolian (13.4%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Nepal (13.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (13.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
| Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 49.9 /100 | #176 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 49.4 /100 | #177 | Average 13.4% |