Burmese vs Slavic Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Burmese
Slavic
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Burmese
Slavs
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
50th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
68th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Slavic Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 459,334,774 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.072 and weighted average of 4.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,876,285 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.830 and weighted average of 4.4%, a difference of 2.9%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Burmese | Slavic |
| Minimum | 0.39% | 0.99% |
| Maximum | 11.5% | 40.0% |
| Range | 11.1% | 39.0% |
| Mean | 4.1% | 7.6% |
| Median | 3.8% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.0% | 9.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 5.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 7.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 7.5% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese and Slavs by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Immigrants from Lithuania (4.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Russian (4.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Turkish (4.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Welsh (4.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and Austrian (4.3%, a difference of 0.45%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Immigrants from Canada (4.4%, a difference of 0.010%), New Zealander (4.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Serbia (4.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Macedonian (4.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Bulgaria (4.4%, a difference of 0.66%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 99.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Okinawans | 99.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.6 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.4 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 99.4 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Slavs | 99.4 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| New Zealanders | 99.4 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 4.4% |