Burmese vs Slavic Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Burmese
Slavic
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Burmese
Slavs
12.8%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.4%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
84.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Slavic Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 459,540,919 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.212 and weighted average of 12.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,968,300 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.626 and weighted average of 15.4%, a difference of 20.2%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Burmese | Slavic |
Minimum | 1.4% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 36.7% | 85.0% |
Range | 35.4% | 83.5% |
Mean | 10.7% | 23.0% |
Median | 9.1% | 15.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 13.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.2% | 23.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.0% | 10.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.5% | 19.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 19.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Demographics Similar to Burmese by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Immigrants from Lithuania (12.9%, a difference of 0.84%), Immigrants from Ireland (12.7%, a difference of 1.1%), Immigrants from Korea (13.0%, a difference of 1.1%), Norwegian (13.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and Bulgarian (13.0%, a difference of 1.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 12.9% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Okinawans | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Brazilian (15.4%, a difference of 0.34%), Icelander (15.4%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Hungary (15.5%, a difference of 0.53%), Immigrants from Peru (15.5%, a difference of 0.58%), and Slovak (15.5%, a difference of 0.62%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Native Hawaiians | 88.7 /100 | #134 | Excellent 15.2% |
Albanians | 88.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.2% |
Immigrants | Spain | 87.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 15.3% |
Peruvians | 87.2 /100 | #137 | Excellent 15.3% |
Welsh | 87.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 15.3% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 15.3% |
New Zealanders | 86.9 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.3% |
Slavs | 84.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.4% |
Brazilians | 82.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.4% |
Icelanders | 82.5 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.4% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 81.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.5% |
Immigrants | Peru | 81.7 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.5% |
Slovaks | 81.4 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.5% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 80.5 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 80.3 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.5% |