British West Indian vs Guatemalan Female Poverty
COMPARE
British West Indian
Guatemalan
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
British West Indians
Guatemalans
17.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
301st/ 347
METRIC RANK
British West Indian vs Guatemalan Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,611,621 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of British West Indians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.142 and weighted average of 17.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 409,219,734 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.353 and weighted average of 16.7%, a difference of 2.0%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | British West Indian | Guatemalan |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 4.6% |
| Maximum | 34.4% | 65.8% |
| Range | 32.6% | 61.2% |
| Mean | 14.9% | 22.9% |
| Median | 15.0% | 19.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.1% | 15.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.3% | 25.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 9.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 11.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 11.2% |
Demographics Similar to British West Indians and Guatemalans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to British West Indians are Immigrants from Somalia (17.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Creek (17.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Guatemala (17.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Dutch West Indian (17.1%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Mexico (17.0%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Guatemalans are Chippewa (16.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Bahamian (16.6%, a difference of 0.33%), Hispanic or Latino (16.6%, a difference of 0.38%), Choctaw (16.8%, a difference of 0.63%), and Immigrants from Central America (16.8%, a difference of 0.70%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |