British West Indian vs Dominican Female Poverty
COMPARE
British West Indian
Dominican
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
British West Indians
Dominicans
17.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
330th/ 347
METRIC RANK
British West Indian vs Dominican Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,611,621 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of British West Indians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.142 and weighted average of 17.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 354,675,769 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Dominicans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.475 and weighted average of 19.1%, a difference of 12.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | British West Indian | Dominican |
Minimum | 1.8% | 5.8% |
Maximum | 34.4% | 49.0% |
Range | 32.6% | 43.2% |
Mean | 14.9% | 22.3% |
Median | 15.0% | 20.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.1% | 16.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.3% | 27.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 11.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 7.7% |
Demographics Similar to British West Indians and Dominicans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to British West Indians are Immigrants from Somalia (17.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Guatemala (17.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Dutch West Indian (17.1%, a difference of 0.25%), U.S. Virgin Islander (17.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and Honduran (17.4%, a difference of 1.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Dominicans are Native/Alaskan (19.2%, a difference of 0.42%), Kiowa (18.6%, a difference of 2.7%), Black/African American (18.6%, a difference of 2.9%), Yakama (18.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and Central American Indian (18.0%, a difference of 6.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 17.6% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 17.7% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.8% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 18.0% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 18.0% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.6% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.6% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.2% |