Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac vs Iranian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac
Iranian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs
Iranians
17.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac vs Iranian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,756,092 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.090 and weighted average of 17.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 312,309,917 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Iranians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.024 and weighted average of 18.0%, a difference of 6.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac | Iranian |
Minimum | 2.7% | 3.3% |
Maximum | 45.3% | 41.3% |
Range | 42.5% | 38.0% |
Mean | 15.7% | 18.1% |
Median | 15.6% | 16.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.7% | 13.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.6% | 21.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.9% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 7.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 7.0% |
Demographics Similar to Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs and Iranians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs are Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from India (16.8%, a difference of 0.83%), Thai (17.3%, a difference of 1.9%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and Immigrants from Iran (17.5%, a difference of 3.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iranians are Indian (Asian) (17.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Bolivian (17.9%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Korea (18.1%, a difference of 0.60%), Immigrants from Bolivia (17.8%, a difference of 0.75%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (18.1%, a difference of 0.88%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 16.1% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |