Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac vs Immigrants from Oceania Single Female Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,756,092 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.090 and weighted average of 17.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 301,448,754 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.531 and weighted average of 20.7%, a difference of 21.9%.

Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac	Immigrants from Oceania
Minimum	2.7%	5.6%
Maximum	45.3%	62.5%
Range	42.5%	56.9%
Mean	15.7%	27.0%
Median	15.6%	21.6%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	11.7%	19.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	19.6%	37.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	7.9%	18.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	7.4%	13.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.3%	12.8%

Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty

Demographics Similar to Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs by Single Female Poverty

In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs are Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from India (16.8%, a difference of 0.83%), Thai (17.3%, a difference of 1.9%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and Immigrants from Iran (17.5%, a difference of 3.0%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Single Female Poverty
Chinese	100.0 /100 \| #1	Exceptional 16.1%
Immigrants \| Taiwan	100.0 /100 \| #2	Exceptional 16.4%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	100.0 /100 \| #3	Exceptional 16.5%
Immigrants \| India	100.0 /100 \| #4	Exceptional 16.8%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	100.0 /100 \| #5	Exceptional 17.0%
Filipinos	100.0 /100 \| #6	Exceptional 17.0%
Thais	100.0 /100 \| #7	Exceptional 17.3%
Immigrants \| Iran	100.0 /100 \| #8	Exceptional 17.5%
Bhutanese	100.0 /100 \| #9	Exceptional 17.7%
Immigrants \| Ireland	100.0 /100 \| #10	Exceptional 17.8%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	100.0 /100 \| #11	Exceptional 17.8%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	100.0 /100 \| #12	Exceptional 17.8%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	100.0 /100 \| #13	Exceptional 17.8%
Bolivians	100.0 /100 \| #14	Exceptional 17.9%
Indians (Asian)	100.0 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 17.9%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Single Female Poverty

In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Danish (20.7%, a difference of 0.11%), South American Indian (20.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Samoan (20.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Costa Rican (20.7%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Western Europe (20.6%, a difference of 0.21%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Single Female Poverty
Immigrants \| Denmark	80.5 /100 \| #150	Excellent 20.5%
Puget Sound Salish	79.6 /100 \| #151	Good 20.6%
Immigrants \| Uruguay	77.7 /100 \| #152	Good 20.6%
Swedes	77.1 /100 \| #153	Good 20.6%
Immigrants \| Western Europe	76.7 /100 \| #154	Good 20.6%
Samoans	76.0 /100 \| #155	Good 20.6%
South American Indians	75.7 /100 \| #156	Good 20.6%
Immigrants \| Oceania	74.3 /100 \| #157	Good 20.7%
Danes	73.0 /100 \| #158	Good 20.7%
Costa Ricans	71.8 /100 \| #159	Good 20.7%
Arabs	70.8 /100 \| #160	Good 20.7%
Kenyans	68.5 /100 \| #161	Good 20.8%
Northern Europeans	68.4 /100 \| #162	Good 20.8%
Lebanese	67.6 /100 \| #163	Good 20.8%
Iraqis	64.5 /100 \| #164	Good 20.8%