Subsaharan African vs Czech Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Subsaharan African
Czech
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Sub-Saharan Africans
Czechs
27.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
67.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.5%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
65.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Subsaharan African vs Czech Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,337,784 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.179 and weighted average of 27.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,223,997 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.141 and weighted average of 27.5%, a difference of 0.050%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
Measurement | Subsaharan African | Czech |
Minimum | 3.0% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 58.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 55.4% | 98.1% |
Mean | 29.4% | 27.9% |
Median | 28.2% | 27.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 25.8% | 22.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.4% | 29.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.1% | 12.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.0% | 12.8% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans and Czechs by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Alaskan Athabascan (27.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (27.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (27.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Romanian (27.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and Mongolian (27.6%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Immigrants from Hong Kong (27.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Alaskan Athabascan (27.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (27.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from South Africa (27.5%, a difference of 0.090%), and Nonimmigrants (27.5%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Portuguese | 77.8 /100 | #151 | Good 27.6% |
Ethiopians | 77.0 /100 | #152 | Good 27.6% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 75.6 /100 | #153 | Good 27.6% |
Icelanders | 75.3 /100 | #154 | Good 27.6% |
Comanche | 74.8 /100 | #155 | Good 27.6% |
Hungarians | 74.6 /100 | #156 | Good 27.6% |
Indians (Asian) | 71.6 /100 | #157 | Good 27.6% |
Romanians | 70.8 /100 | #158 | Good 27.6% |
Mongolians | 70.7 /100 | #159 | Good 27.6% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 67.5 /100 | #160 | Good 27.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 67.1 /100 | #161 | Good 27.6% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 67.0 /100 | #162 | Good 27.6% |
Czechs | 65.3 /100 | #163 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 61.3 /100 | #165 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 61.2 /100 | #166 | Good 27.5% |
Dominicans | 61.1 /100 | #167 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 60.9 /100 | #168 | Good 27.5% |
Seminole | 56.9 /100 | #169 | Average 27.5% |
Cherokee | 56.7 /100 | #170 | Average 27.5% |
Blackfeet | 54.3 /100 | #171 | Average 27.5% |