Immigrants from Turkey vs Czech Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Immigrants from Turkey
Czech
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Immigrants from Turkey
Czechs
27.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
46.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
180th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.5%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
65.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Turkey vs Czech Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,939,081 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Turkey and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.449 and weighted average of 27.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,223,997 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.141 and weighted average of 27.5%, a difference of 0.42%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Turkey | Czech |
Minimum | 12.6% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 37.5% | 100.0% |
Range | 24.8% | 98.1% |
Mean | 26.8% | 27.9% |
Median | 27.0% | 27.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.0% | 22.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.9% | 29.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 12.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 12.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Turkey and Czechs by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Turkey are Turkish (27.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Aleut (27.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Spanish American (27.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Ugandan (27.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from China (27.4%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Immigrants from Hong Kong (27.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Alaskan Athabascan (27.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (27.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from South Africa (27.5%, a difference of 0.090%), and Nonimmigrants (27.5%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Alaskan Athabascans | 67.1 /100 | #161 | Good 27.6% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 67.0 /100 | #162 | Good 27.6% |
Czechs | 65.3 /100 | #163 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 61.3 /100 | #165 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 61.2 /100 | #166 | Good 27.5% |
Dominicans | 61.1 /100 | #167 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 60.9 /100 | #168 | Good 27.5% |
Seminole | 56.9 /100 | #169 | Average 27.5% |
Cherokee | 56.7 /100 | #170 | Average 27.5% |
Blackfeet | 54.3 /100 | #171 | Average 27.5% |
Israelis | 53.9 /100 | #172 | Average 27.5% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 52.2 /100 | #173 | Average 27.5% |
Whites/Caucasians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 27.4% |
British | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 27.4% |
Immigrants | China | 49.6 /100 | #176 | Average 27.4% |
Ugandans | 49.2 /100 | #177 | Average 27.4% |
Spanish Americans | 48.9 /100 | #178 | Average 27.4% |
Turks | 46.9 /100 | #179 | Average 27.4% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 46.9 /100 | #180 | Average 27.4% |
Aleuts | 46.7 /100 | #181 | Average 27.4% |