Scotch-Irish vs White/Caucasian Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Scotch-Irish
White/Caucasian
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Scotch-Irish
Whites/Caucasians
33.3%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
10.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
210th/ 347
METRIC RANK
33.3%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
10.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
209th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scotch-Irish vs White/Caucasian Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 488,755,262 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.663 and weighted average of 33.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 513,410,964 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.751 and weighted average of 33.3%, a difference of 0.0%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Scotch-Irish | White/Caucasian |
| Minimum | 16.7% | 26.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 82.1% |
| Range | 83.3% | 56.0% |
| Mean | 60.2% | 40.4% |
| Median | 51.3% | 37.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 36.6% | 31.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 94.4% | 45.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 57.8% | 14.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 28.1% | 11.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 27.8% | 11.2% |
Demographics Similar to Scotch-Irish and Whites/Caucasians by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Scotch-Irish are Ecuadorian (33.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Celtic (33.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Hawaiian (33.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Sudan (33.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Costa Rica (33.4%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Ecuadorian (33.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Celtic (33.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Hawaiian (33.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Sudan (33.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Costa Rica (33.4%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 18.9 /100 | #199 | Poor 32.8% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 18.8 /100 | #200 | Poor 32.8% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 16.7 /100 | #201 | Poor 32.9% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 16.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 32.9% |
| Ute | 14.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 33.0% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 14.3 /100 | #204 | Poor 33.0% |
| German Russians | 13.1 /100 | #205 | Poor 33.1% |
| Uruguayans | 12.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 33.1% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 33.2% |
| Hawaiians | 11.3 /100 | #208 | Poor 33.2% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 10.7 /100 | #209 | Poor 33.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 10.7 /100 | #210 | Poor 33.3% |
| Ecuadorians | 10.5 /100 | #211 | Poor 33.3% |
| Celtics | 10.2 /100 | #212 | Poor 33.3% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 9.5 /100 | #213 | Tragic 33.4% |
| Slovaks | 9.3 /100 | #214 | Tragic 33.4% |
| French | 8.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 33.4% |
| Nepalese | 7.8 /100 | #216 | Tragic 33.5% |
| Spaniards | 7.0 /100 | #217 | Tragic 33.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 5.9 /100 | #218 | Tragic 33.7% |
| Alsatians | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 33.8% |