Ecuadorian vs White/Caucasian Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
White/Caucasian
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Ecuadorians
Whites/Caucasians
33.3%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
10.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
33.3%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
10.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
209th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ecuadorian vs White/Caucasian Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 300,726,329 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.331 and weighted average of 33.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 513,410,964 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.751 and weighted average of 33.3%, a difference of 0.050%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ecuadorian | White/Caucasian |
Minimum | 12.5% | 26.1% |
Maximum | 68.3% | 82.1% |
Range | 55.8% | 56.0% |
Mean | 35.1% | 40.4% |
Median | 33.3% | 37.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 27.4% | 31.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 40.6% | 45.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.2% | 14.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.5% | 11.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.3% | 11.2% |
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians and Whites/Caucasians by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Scotch-Irish (33.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Celtic (33.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Hawaiian (33.2%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Sudan (33.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Costa Rica (33.4%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Scotch-Irish (33.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Celtic (33.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Hawaiian (33.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Sudan (33.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Costa Rica (33.4%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Immigrants | Germany | 18.8 /100 | #200 | Poor 32.8% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 16.7 /100 | #201 | Poor 32.9% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 16.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 32.9% |
Ute | 14.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 33.0% |
Immigrants | Africa | 14.3 /100 | #204 | Poor 33.0% |
German Russians | 13.1 /100 | #205 | Poor 33.1% |
Uruguayans | 12.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 33.1% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 33.2% |
Hawaiians | 11.3 /100 | #208 | Poor 33.2% |
Whites/Caucasians | 10.7 /100 | #209 | Poor 33.3% |
Scotch-Irish | 10.7 /100 | #210 | Poor 33.3% |
Ecuadorians | 10.5 /100 | #211 | Poor 33.3% |
Celtics | 10.2 /100 | #212 | Poor 33.3% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 9.5 /100 | #213 | Tragic 33.4% |
Slovaks | 9.3 /100 | #214 | Tragic 33.4% |
French | 8.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 33.4% |
Nepalese | 7.8 /100 | #216 | Tragic 33.5% |
Spaniards | 7.0 /100 | #217 | Tragic 33.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 5.9 /100 | #218 | Tragic 33.7% |
Alsatians | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 33.8% |
Portuguese | 5.4 /100 | #220 | Tragic 33.8% |