Osage vs Mongolian Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Osage
Mongolian
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Osage
Mongolians
27.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
79.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
70.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs Mongolian Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,796,912 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Osage and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.023 and weighted average of 27.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,279,389 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Mongolians and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.232 and weighted average of 27.6%, a difference of 0.24%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
Measurement | Osage | Mongolian |
Minimum | 6.8% | 4.0% |
Maximum | 43.8% | 42.6% |
Range | 36.9% | 38.6% |
Mean | 25.8% | 26.7% |
Median | 26.7% | 27.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.9% | 23.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.6% | 30.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.7% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.7% | 7.5% |
Demographics Similar to Osage and Mongolians by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Immigrants from Moldova (27.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Menominee (27.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Brazilian (27.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Chile (27.7%, a difference of 0.020%), and Basque (27.7%, a difference of 0.020%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Mongolians are Romanian (27.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Indian (Asian) (27.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Subsaharan African (27.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Alaskan Athabascan (27.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Bangladesh (27.6%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 80.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 27.7% |
Brazilians | 79.6 /100 | #144 | Good 27.7% |
Immigrants | Chile | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 27.7% |
Basques | 79.5 /100 | #146 | Good 27.7% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 79.1 /100 | #147 | Good 27.6% |
Osage | 79.0 /100 | #148 | Good 27.6% |
Menominee | 78.9 /100 | #149 | Good 27.6% |
Argentineans | 78.5 /100 | #150 | Good 27.6% |
Portuguese | 77.8 /100 | #151 | Good 27.6% |
Ethiopians | 77.0 /100 | #152 | Good 27.6% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 75.6 /100 | #153 | Good 27.6% |
Icelanders | 75.3 /100 | #154 | Good 27.6% |
Comanche | 74.8 /100 | #155 | Good 27.6% |
Hungarians | 74.6 /100 | #156 | Good 27.6% |
Indians (Asian) | 71.6 /100 | #157 | Good 27.6% |
Romanians | 70.8 /100 | #158 | Good 27.6% |
Mongolians | 70.7 /100 | #159 | Good 27.6% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 67.5 /100 | #160 | Good 27.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 67.1 /100 | #161 | Good 27.6% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 67.0 /100 | #162 | Good 27.6% |
Czechs | 65.3 /100 | #163 | Good 27.5% |