Icelander vs Mongolian Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Icelander
Mongolian
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Icelanders
Mongolians
27.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
75.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
70.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Icelander vs Mongolian Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,563,345 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.245 and weighted average of 27.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,279,389 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Mongolians and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.232 and weighted average of 27.6%, a difference of 0.13%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
Measurement | Icelander | Mongolian |
Minimum | 5.9% | 4.0% |
Maximum | 53.9% | 42.6% |
Range | 48.1% | 38.6% |
Mean | 25.4% | 26.7% |
Median | 26.7% | 27.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.4% | 23.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.1% | 30.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.7% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.5% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.4% | 7.5% |
Demographics Similar to Icelanders and Mongolians by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Immigrants from Cabo Verde (27.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Comanche (27.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Hungarian (27.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Ethiopian (27.6%, a difference of 0.050%), and Portuguese (27.6%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Mongolians are Romanian (27.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Indian (Asian) (27.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Subsaharan African (27.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Alaskan Athabascan (27.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Bangladesh (27.6%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Basques | 79.5 /100 | #146 | Good 27.7% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 79.1 /100 | #147 | Good 27.6% |
Osage | 79.0 /100 | #148 | Good 27.6% |
Menominee | 78.9 /100 | #149 | Good 27.6% |
Argentineans | 78.5 /100 | #150 | Good 27.6% |
Portuguese | 77.8 /100 | #151 | Good 27.6% |
Ethiopians | 77.0 /100 | #152 | Good 27.6% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 75.6 /100 | #153 | Good 27.6% |
Icelanders | 75.3 /100 | #154 | Good 27.6% |
Comanche | 74.8 /100 | #155 | Good 27.6% |
Hungarians | 74.6 /100 | #156 | Good 27.6% |
Indians (Asian) | 71.6 /100 | #157 | Good 27.6% |
Romanians | 70.8 /100 | #158 | Good 27.6% |
Mongolians | 70.7 /100 | #159 | Good 27.6% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 67.5 /100 | #160 | Good 27.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 67.1 /100 | #161 | Good 27.6% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 67.0 /100 | #162 | Good 27.6% |
Czechs | 65.3 /100 | #163 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 61.3 /100 | #165 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 61.2 /100 | #166 | Good 27.5% |