Japanese vs Bhutanese Family Households
COMPARE
Japanese
Bhutanese
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Japanese
Bhutanese
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
68th/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
71st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Japanese vs Bhutanese Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,074,128 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.151 and weighted average of 65.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,147,880 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.028 and weighted average of 65.9%, a difference of 0.060%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Japanese | Bhutanese |
Minimum | 39.1% | 36.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 60.9% | 63.4% |
Mean | 66.2% | 69.5% |
Median | 66.6% | 69.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.5% | 64.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 72.9% | 75.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.4% | 11.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.2% | 10.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.1% | 10.8% |
Demographics Similar to Japanese and Bhutanese by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Filipino (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Malaysian (65.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (65.9%, a difference of 0.040%), and Costa Rican (65.9%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Malaysian (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Portuguese (65.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and Filipino (65.9%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 66.0% |
South Americans | 100.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Central Americans | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Houma | 99.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Immigrants | Azores | 99.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | South America | 99.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Yaqui | 99.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 99.8 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 65.6% |