Danish vs Bhutanese Family Households
COMPARE
Danish
Bhutanese
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Danes
Bhutanese
66.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
61st/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
71st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Danish vs Bhutanese Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 473,910,388 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.269 and weighted average of 66.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,147,880 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.028 and weighted average of 65.9%, a difference of 0.26%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Danish | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 29.2% | 36.6% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 70.8% | 63.4% |
| Mean | 73.3% | 69.5% |
| Median | 72.9% | 69.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 65.2% | 64.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 79.2% | 75.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.0% | 11.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.9% | 10.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.8% | 10.8% |
Demographics Similar to Danes and Bhutanese by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are South American (66.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Korea (66.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Central American (66.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Asia (66.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (66.0%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Malaysian (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Portuguese (65.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Japanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| South Americans | 100.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Central Americans | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 65.7% |
| Houma | 99.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 65.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 99.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 65.6% |