Immigrants vs Iroquois Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Immigrants
Iroquois
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Immigrants
Iroquois
46.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
43.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
177th/ 347
METRIC RANK
43.7%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants vs Iroquois Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 577,047,094 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.018 and weighted average of 46.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,249,804 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.281 and weighted average of 43.7%, a difference of 5.9%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants | Iroquois |
Minimum | 18.2% | 9.6% |
Maximum | 80.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 61.8% | 90.4% |
Mean | 46.7% | 45.4% |
Median | 47.1% | 46.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 45.1% | 40.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 48.7% | 52.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 12.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 17.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.1% | 17.0% |
Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households
Demographics Similar to Immigrants by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants are Immigrants from Costa Rica (46.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (46.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Cajun (46.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Mongolian (46.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and Malaysian (46.3%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
South Americans | 58.0 /100 | #170 | Average 46.6% |
Immigrants | Chile | 55.7 /100 | #171 | Average 46.5% |
Immigrants | Australia | 54.6 /100 | #172 | Average 46.5% |
Immigrants | Norway | 52.0 /100 | #173 | Average 46.5% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.4% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 46.1 /100 | #175 | Average 46.4% |
Cajuns | 45.2 /100 | #176 | Average 46.4% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 43.8 /100 | #177 | Average 46.3% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 43.4 /100 | #178 | Average 46.3% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 43.0 /100 | #179 | Average 46.3% |
Mongolians | 42.0 /100 | #180 | Average 46.3% |
Malaysians | 41.8 /100 | #181 | Average 46.3% |
Yugoslavians | 38.9 /100 | #182 | Fair 46.2% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 38.3 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.2% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 36.9 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.2% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Central American Indian (43.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Blackfeet (43.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Cameroon (43.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Alaskan Athabascan (43.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and Ugandan (43.8%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Seminole | 0.4 /100 | #252 | Tragic 44.0% |
Central Americans | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 43.9% |
Apache | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 43.9% |
Shoshone | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 43.9% |
Ugandans | 0.3 /100 | #256 | Tragic 43.8% |
Blackfeet | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 43.8% |
Central American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 43.8% |
Iroquois | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 43.7% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 43.7% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 43.6% |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 43.6% |
Cree | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 43.6% |
Bangladeshis | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 43.5% |
Moroccans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 43.5% |
Ecuadorians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 43.5% |