Bangladeshi vs Iroquois Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Bangladeshi
Iroquois
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Bangladeshis
Iroquois
43.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
264th/ 347
METRIC RANK
43.7%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bangladeshi vs Iroquois Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,328,159 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.276 and weighted average of 43.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,249,804 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.281 and weighted average of 43.7%, a difference of 0.50%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bangladeshi | Iroquois |
Minimum | 24.1% | 9.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 75.9% | 90.4% |
Mean | 46.0% | 45.4% |
Median | 44.1% | 46.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 39.3% | 40.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 49.3% | 52.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.9% | 12.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.7% | 17.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.6% | 17.0% |
Demographics Similar to Bangladeshis and Iroquois by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Moroccan (43.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Cree (43.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Ecuadorian (43.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Native/Alaskan (43.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and Vietnamese (43.6%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Central American Indian (43.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Blackfeet (43.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Cameroon (43.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Alaskan Athabascan (43.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and Ugandan (43.8%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
German Russians | 0.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 44.0% |
Seminole | 0.4 /100 | #252 | Tragic 44.0% |
Central Americans | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 43.9% |
Apache | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 43.9% |
Shoshone | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 43.9% |
Ugandans | 0.3 /100 | #256 | Tragic 43.8% |
Blackfeet | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 43.8% |
Central American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 43.8% |
Iroquois | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 43.7% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 43.7% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 43.6% |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 43.6% |
Cree | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 43.6% |
Bangladeshis | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 43.5% |
Moroccans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 43.5% |
Ecuadorians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 43.5% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 43.5% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 43.4% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 43.3% |
Yuman | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 43.3% |
Guatemalans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 43.3% |