Immigrants from Uganda vs Ottawa Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uganda
Ottawa
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Uganda
Ottawa
62.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
288th/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
277th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uganda vs Ottawa Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,974,849 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.035 and weighted average of 62.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,944,420 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ottawa and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.110 and weighted average of 63.0%, a difference of 0.42%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Uganda | Ottawa |
Minimum | 41.7% | 50.0% |
Maximum | 82.6% | 89.2% |
Range | 40.9% | 39.2% |
Mean | 62.2% | 66.2% |
Median | 63.9% | 65.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 56.5% | 60.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 68.3% | 69.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.9% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.5% | 7.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.4% | 7.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uganda and Ottawa by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uganda are British West Indian (62.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Latvian (62.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Mongolian (62.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Nepal (62.7%, a difference of 0.090%), and Australian (62.8%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ottawa are Immigrants from Belgium (63.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Serbian (63.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Lumbee (63.1%, a difference of 0.070%), West Indian (63.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (63.1%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Turkey | 0.3 /100 | #272 | Tragic 63.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 0.3 /100 | #273 | Tragic 63.1% |
Lumbee | 0.3 /100 | #274 | Tragic 63.1% |
West Indians | 0.3 /100 | #275 | Tragic 63.1% |
Serbians | 0.3 /100 | #276 | Tragic 63.0% |
Ottawa | 0.3 /100 | #277 | Tragic 63.0% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 0.2 /100 | #278 | Tragic 63.0% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.2 /100 | #279 | Tragic 63.0% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 0.2 /100 | #280 | Tragic 63.0% |
Estonians | 0.2 /100 | #281 | Tragic 62.9% |
New Zealanders | 0.1 /100 | #282 | Tragic 62.9% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 0.1 /100 | #283 | Tragic 62.9% |
Australians | 0.1 /100 | #284 | Tragic 62.8% |
Mongolians | 0.1 /100 | #285 | Tragic 62.8% |
British West Indians | 0.1 /100 | #286 | Tragic 62.8% |
Latvians | 0.1 /100 | #287 | Tragic 62.8% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 0.1 /100 | #288 | Tragic 62.7% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 0.1 /100 | #289 | Tragic 62.7% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 62.6% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 62.6% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 62.6% |