Immigrants from Uganda vs Latvian Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uganda
Latvian
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Uganda
Latvians
62.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
288th/ 347
METRIC RANK
62.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
287th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uganda vs Latvian Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,974,849 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.035 and weighted average of 62.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,652,081 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Latvians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.086 and weighted average of 62.8%, a difference of 0.020%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Uganda | Latvian |
Minimum | 41.7% | 31.0% |
Maximum | 82.6% | 92.3% |
Range | 40.9% | 61.3% |
Mean | 62.2% | 65.1% |
Median | 63.9% | 65.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 56.5% | 60.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 68.3% | 70.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.9% | 10.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.5% | 11.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.4% | 11.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uganda and Latvians by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uganda are British West Indian (62.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Mongolian (62.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Nepal (62.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Australian (62.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Grenada (62.6%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are British West Indian (62.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Mongolian (62.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Nepal (62.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Australian (62.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Denmark (62.9%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Ottawa | 0.3 /100 | #277 | Tragic 63.0% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 0.2 /100 | #278 | Tragic 63.0% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.2 /100 | #279 | Tragic 63.0% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 0.2 /100 | #280 | Tragic 63.0% |
Estonians | 0.2 /100 | #281 | Tragic 62.9% |
New Zealanders | 0.1 /100 | #282 | Tragic 62.9% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 0.1 /100 | #283 | Tragic 62.9% |
Australians | 0.1 /100 | #284 | Tragic 62.8% |
Mongolians | 0.1 /100 | #285 | Tragic 62.8% |
British West Indians | 0.1 /100 | #286 | Tragic 62.8% |
Latvians | 0.1 /100 | #287 | Tragic 62.8% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 0.1 /100 | #288 | Tragic 62.7% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 0.1 /100 | #289 | Tragic 62.7% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 62.6% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 62.6% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 62.6% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 62.5% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 62.5% |
Okinawans | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 62.5% |
Slovenes | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 62.4% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 62.4% |