Immigrants from Hungary vs Shoshone Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hungary
Shoshone
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Hungary
Shoshone
63.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
4.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
225th/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
9.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hungary vs Shoshone Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,664,672 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hungary and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.525 and weighted average of 63.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,615,877 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.277 and weighted average of 63.8%, a difference of 0.28%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Hungary | Shoshone |
Minimum | 51.6% | 43.8% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 88.1% |
Range | 48.4% | 44.3% |
Mean | 71.0% | 67.0% |
Median | 69.4% | 65.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 63.9% | 60.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 74.2% | 73.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.3% | 12.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.6% | 9.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.4% | 9.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hungary and Shoshone by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hungary are Turkish (63.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bahamas (63.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (63.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Blackfeet (63.6%, a difference of 0.070%), and French Canadian (63.7%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Shoshone are Immigrants from Netherlands (63.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Thailand (63.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (63.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Celtic (63.8%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Bangladesh (63.9%, a difference of 0.070%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 11.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 63.9% |
Sierra Leoneans | 11.2 /100 | #209 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 9.6 /100 | #210 | Tragic 63.8% |
Shoshone | 9.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 63.8% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 9.4 /100 | #212 | Tragic 63.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 8.8 /100 | #213 | Tragic 63.8% |
Celtics | 8.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 63.8% |
Belgians | 7.6 /100 | #215 | Tragic 63.8% |
Croatians | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 63.8% |
Osage | 7.0 /100 | #217 | Tragic 63.7% |
Marshallese | 6.9 /100 | #218 | Tragic 63.7% |
Macedonians | 6.5 /100 | #219 | Tragic 63.7% |
Immigrants | Europe | 6.4 /100 | #220 | Tragic 63.7% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 5.9 /100 | #221 | Tragic 63.7% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 5.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 63.7% |
French Canadians | 5.4 /100 | #223 | Tragic 63.7% |
Turks | 4.5 /100 | #224 | Tragic 63.6% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 4.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 63.6% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 4.2 /100 | #226 | Tragic 63.6% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 4.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 63.6% |
Blackfeet | 3.6 /100 | #228 | Tragic 63.6% |